Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18457 (JHR)

SAVITRI DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/303/2026 · 2026-06-30

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:19074 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 303 of 2026 Savitri Devi ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 3. The Office-in-Charge of Parsudih P.S., East Singhbhum … Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, Sr. S.C.-I --- Order No. 02 Dated 30th June, 2026 Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for issuance of show cause to the respondent No. 3 as to why the boundary wall of the petitioner has been demolished by the respondent No. 3 which is situated in Mouza Kalimati, Thana No. 1163, Khata No. 372, Plot No. 868 comprising an area of 35 decimals. The petitioner has further prayed for a direction upon the respondent No. 3 to pay compensation to the petitioner in lieu of the boundary wall which has been demolished by the respondent No. 3. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that without any information the boundary which has been constructed by the petitioner and which is situated within the premises belonging to the petitioner has been demolished by the respondent No. 3 and on account of such illegal demolition, the petitioner has also preferred a representation before the respondent No. 2 which is still pending. I have also heard Mr. Ashok Kr. Yadav, learned Sr. S.C.-I. Regard being had to the fact that the representation has already been submitted by the petitioner before the respondent No. 2, this writ application stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of two weeks from today stating her grievance in details before the respondent No. 2. If such representation is filed within the period as aforesaid, the respondent No. 2 shall endeavour to dispose of the said representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.) 30.06.2026 MK