Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18456 (AP)

MYNODDIN ELEMENTARY TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE v. SRI RAM PRAKASH SISODIA IAS

CC/238/2019 · 2026-03-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010116292019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 238/2019 Between: 1. MYNODDIN ELEMENTARY TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, GIDDALUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS CORRESPONDENT AND SECRETARY S MT. S .MEHATAB, W/O S.A.K.MYNODDIN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RIO GIDDALUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI RAM PRAKASH SISODIA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, STATE OF A.P., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. K SANDHYA RANI, COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, A.P IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 3. SMT M V RAJYA LAKSHMI, DIRECTOR, STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING, (SCERT), ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the Respondents herein for their willful disobedience and flouting of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.24611/2018 dt.18- 07-2018 passed by Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. D KASIM SAHEB Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 238/2019 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 18.07.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24611 of 2018. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the contempt case, the Writ Petition itself was disposed of. As such no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 203 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 238/2019 31.03.2026 TTPPSS