[2026:RJ-JP:3943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16648/2018 Smt. Santra Devi Wife Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Harijan Basti Gadda Colony, Green Godwan Road, Bazaria, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj And Rural Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Panchayati Raj And Rural Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami Mr. Rakesh Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC with Mr. Abhilash Paliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 28/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “The non-petitioners may be directed to consider the case of petitioner for regularization and grant the regular pay scale applicable to Class-IV employees in the non-petitioner department to the petitioner. Non-Petitioners may be further directed to pay the arrears of regular pay scale in the light of Hon’ble Apex Court decision in State of Punjab Vs. Jagjeet Singh.” [2026:RJ-JP:3943] (2 of 2) [CW-16648/2018] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 06.01.2026 in SB CWP No.13016/2011 titled as Satu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the issue is already considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that the writ petition be allowed on same terms as allowed by a Co-ordinate Bench in case of Satu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 3. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection in case writ petition is disposed on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Satu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. In view of submission, the instant writ petition is allowed in same terms as laid down in case of Satu Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /82