RAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA S/O SHRI PYARI LAL v. THE SECRETARY
CW/12206/2025 · 2026-02-13
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18448 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18448 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7090] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12206/2025 Rajendra Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Pyari Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Post 56, Bandanwada, Tehsil Bhinay, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) (At Present Working On The Post Of Driver At Office Of Assistant Engineer Water Resources Sub Division Beawar District Beawar Rajasthan) (Employee I. D. No. - Rjal 199301010626). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Rajasthan Jaipur Indra Gandhi Nahar Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Superintending Engineer, (Legislative Assembly Office Of Chief Engineer Water Resource Department, Jaipur.
4. Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department Ajmer.
5. Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division Beawar.
6. Shri Suresh Singh, Junior Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division Bandanwada, Bhinay, District Kekri.
7. Mamta Kumari, Junior Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division Bandanwada, Bhinay, District Kekri.
8. Rajesh Kumar, Junior Clerk, Water Resources Sub Division Bandanwada, Bhinay, District Kekri.
9. Shri Namo Narayan, The Then Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division Bandanwada, Bhinay, District Kekri.
10. Surendra, Assistant Engineer Water Resources Sub Division Bandanwada, Bhinay, District Kekri.
11. Vikas, Chief Engineer Water Resources Department Ajmer.
12. Mahesh, Superintending Engineer Water Resources Department Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rekha Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma
[2026:RJ-JP:7090] (2 of 2) [CW-12206/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/02/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Class IV employee and transferring him at distance of around 30 km., vide impugned order dated 15.01.2025 would cause serious prejudice and personal difficulties. Learned counsel submits that petitioner seeks liberty to file representation before the Competent Court for redresssal of his grievances.
2. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Jaipur, who shall seek and decide the representation filed by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /153