Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18438 (DEL)

MS R v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS

W.P.(CRL)/1514/2026 · 2026-09-16

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010208862026 + W.P.(CRL) 1514/2026 MS R .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shivani Verma, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State along with SI Anmol Lavish, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 16.09.2026 1. In paragraph 6, the status report takes the following position: “6. It is further submitted that the complainant had also moved an application before the Witness Protection Committee, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, seeking protection. The said application was considered by the Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQs), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi/Chairperson, Witness Protection Committee. Vide order dated 11.06.2026, protection was provided to the complainant/victim, and directions were issued to the SHO, PS Paharganj, Delhi, to provide necessary protection to the applicant/witness whenever she appears before trial Court.” 2. The petitioner do admits the aforesaid averments, however, complaints that on 20.07.2026, certain objectionable posts were made by the accused disclosing the identity of the victim as well as her family members. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:57:56 The petitioner therefore has made the complaint to the concerned Investigating Officer and SHO. She therefore submits that no action has been taken thereon. 3. Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned ASC appearing for the State submits that the complaint shall be taken to its logical conclusion and the appropriate decision shall be taken thereon. 4. In view of the aforesaid, as of now, nothing more is required to be adjudicated. 5. If the grievance is not mitigated, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a fresh petition. 6. The trial Court shall proceed in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 / tr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:57:56