Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18437 (KAR)

ANANDA J v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18269/2025 · 2026-06-01

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25335 WP No. 18269 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18269 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. ANANDA J AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O MANIKKEL, COMPUTER EDUCATION TUTOR AT RVS RURAL PRE - UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MINORITY STUDENTS, POST-METRIC HOSTEL, CHALLAKERE 2. LAKSHMIDEVI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O DECEASED SHIVANN V, READING ROOM SUPERVISOR AT SRI SRI MARUTHI MAHASWAMY PRE-UNIVERSITY COLLEGE BACKWARD CLASS STUDENTS POST-METRIC HOSTEL, KONDLAHALLI. ADDRESS: C/O THE SECRETARY, R.V.SOCIETY EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION NEAR MUNICIPAL PUMP HOUSE, VALMIKI NAGAR, CHALLAKERE TOWN 577522, CHITRADURGA DIST. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25335 WP No. 18269 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY THE DIRECTOR PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560012 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577501 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. RAMESH NAIK, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. CALL FOR THE RECORDS II. DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A, BEARING PETITION NO.124(VI)/98 (ED 90 SOH 1999 (VI)) DATED- 19.06.1999 FOR WHICH NOT ONLY THE HON’BLE MINISTER FOR EDUCATION HAS ASKED FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION, BUT ALSO THE RESPONDENT HAS HIMSELF ASSURED THIS COURT TO IMPLEMENT THE SAME. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25335 WP No. 18269 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6