1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 1543 of 2026 Decided on: 05.08.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ajay Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge The respondents have already considered the case of the petitioner under order dated 28.10.2025 (Annexure E-2) pursuant to the directions issued in Ajay Kumar versus State of H.P. and others2. Hence, this execution petition seeking enforcement of Ajay Kumar2 where the respondents were only directed to consider the petitioner’s representation in accordance with law has been rendered infructuous. If the petitioner has any grievance pursuant to the consideration order passed by the respondents or in furtherance of aforesaid consideration order, it is for him to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of his grievance. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2CWP No.9212/2025, dated 03.06.2025. 2 2. Granting such liberty, the present execution petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 05, 2026 Judge yogesh