CRWP-5844 IN THE (173) MADHU AND STATE OF H CORAM: Present: MANISHA B CRM-W-729 1. CRWP-5844 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at their represent 2. submitted tha 13.05.2026 be 5844-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da U AND ANOTHER Versus
OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Ms. Sangam Yadav, Advocate for Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 729-2026 Application is allowed, as prayed 5844-2026 The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondents No. resentation dated 13.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Superintendent of Police JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5844-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
ate for the petitioners aryana rayed for. een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 8 and to take action on nnexure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on Police, Hansi (Annexure P-5) AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5844 raising their g has not yet be further submit appropriate di Police, Hansi and take neces 3. 4. behalf of the r in due course during the cou 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5844-2026 (O&M) (2) heir grievances as mentioned in the p yet been considered and no action h submitted that at this stage, the petiti iate directions are issued to responde ansi to decide the aforesaid represent necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Hary f the respondents-State and submits th course. Let a complete set of the pap he course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 13.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   the present petition but the same tion has been taken thereon. She petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Superintendent of resentation filed by the petitioners , Haryana, has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done he paperbook be supplied to her r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.