Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010113042026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 336/2026 Between:
1. B NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE B.M. NAIK, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,R/O.
H.NO. 1-4-441, FIRST FLOOR, KOTHAPET, SATYANAGAR COLONY, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA - 500 035. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
2. BANAVATH VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O. B. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,R/O. H.NO. 81-346-A1, 1 FLOOR,BALAJI NAGAR, NEAR GOOTY PETROL BUNK,ARUNODAYA COLONY, KALLUR MANDAL,KURNOOL CITY - 518 003. 3. B MAHESHWARI, D/O. B. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS,R/O.
H.NO. 81-346-A1, POOR,BALAJI NAGAR, NEAR GOOTY PETROL BUNK,ARUNODAYA COLONY, KALLUR MANDAL,KURNOOL CITY - 518 003.
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased tomay be raised at the time of hearing, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 02.02.2026 in CrI.M.P. No. 183 of 2025 in F.C.M.C.
2
No. 67 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court - cum - IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool and consequently pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 10 days in representing the CRLRC (SR) No. 2240 of 2026 before this Hon’ble Court, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copies in CrI.M.P. No. 183 of 2025 in F.C.M.C. No. 67 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court - cum - IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 02.02.2026 passed in CrI.M.P. No. 183 of 2025 in F.C.M.C. No. 67 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court - cum - IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in M.C No.47 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court cum - IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KURNOOL pending disposal of the above criminal revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 336/2026
JUDGMENT:
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the learned Family Court- cum-IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, in Crl.M.P.No.183 of 2025 in FCMC.No.67 of 2024 granting interim maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. Heard Sri Varun Byreddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State.
3. This revision is preferred against the impugned order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the learned Family Court-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool, in Crl.M.P.No.183 of 2025 in FCMC.No.67 of 2024. Learned Judge vide order dated 02.02.2026 granted interim maintenance of Rs.25,000/- per month to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3/wife and minor daughter of the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the interim maintenance granted by the learned Trial Court is on the higher side. The learned Judge failed to consider the substantial recurring expenses and the existing financial liabilities borne by the petitioner.
4
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders, as the impugned order pertains only to interim maintenance and the main case is still pending.
6. As can be seen from the record, this is a revision preferred against the interim maintenance and impugned
order would show that the petitioner/husband is a retired Central Government Employee and no oral or documentary evidence is adduced at the stage of enquiry in the petition filed by the wife seeking interim maintenance. It is not in dispute that the wife and minor child are residing separately from the petitioner.
7. Considering the submissions made, since this revision is preferred challenging the order dated 02.02.2026 granting interim maintenance to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein, it is apposite to dispose of the present revision without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respective parties with a direction to the learned Trial Judge to dispose of the main case i.e., FCMC.No.67 of 2024 as expeditiously as possible without granting any adjournment in a casual way by mere asking, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Trial Judge shall direct both the parties to appear before the District Legal Services Authority, Kurnool, to workout their chance of reconciliation or settlement in this matter. .
5
8. With the above observations, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of at the stage of admission.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 31.03.2026. Note: Issue CC by 02.04.2026, B/o. UPS
6
78 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 336/2026
Dt.31.03.2026
UPS