IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36856 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Subash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar S/O Late Kameshwar yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 2. Alok Kumar S/O Subhash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 3. Ishwari Yadav @ Ishwar Yadav S/O Ganga Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 4. Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Raj S/O Ishwari Yadav @ Ishwar Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 5. Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Banty S/O Ishwari Yadav @ Ishwar Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 6. Lavkush Kumar S/O Ishwari Yadav @ Ishwar Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 7. Ramchandra Yadav S/O Late Prasad Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 8. Vimlesh Kumar S/O Dularchand Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 9. Pintu Kumar @ Pinku Kumar S/O Suresh Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. 10. Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Prasad Yadav S/O Charittar Yadav @ Late Ramcharitar Yadav Resident of Village- Fenagi, P.S- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Jee. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 17-06-2026 Heard the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner no. 1 namely, Subash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar was arrested and as such, the same has become infructuous. He, therefore, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36856 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 seeks permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition. 3. Considering aforesaid submission, the prayer of anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1 namely, Subash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar is dismissed having being infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this petition survives only against petitioner nos. 2 to 10. 5. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 303(2), 324(2), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS. 6. The allegation against petitioners is to open fire upon informant and others and also to damage his car. It is also alleged that after the occurrence the car of informant is still missing. 7. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that parties are agnets and present false criminal case was lodged just to settle the land dispute, which is primarily civil in nature. It is also submitted that parties are in enmical terms. It is submitted that no person Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36856 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 received injury during the occurrence and moreover, petitioner no. 7 and 8 are of clean antecedents, whereas rest of the petitioners found involved in one more criminal case where they are on bail. 8. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail. 9. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of overall nature of accusation in the background of previous enmities, accordingly above-named petitioner no. 2 to 10, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM VI, Gaya Jee /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Sudha/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T