Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18424 (CHH)

SMT. SUDHA PRADHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2727/2026 · 2026-03-23

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:13930 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2727 of 2026 Smt. Sudha Pradhan W/o Rajeshwar Ram Bhagat Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Tehsilpara Kusmi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Director Directorate Of Higher Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Principal At Government Agrasen College, Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L.. HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 24/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an, order, or direction to the respondents to grant the appointment to the petitioner as Guest Lecturer (Sociology) Belha, Government Agrasen College, at Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 / 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an, order, or direction to the respondents to decide the representation preferred by the petitioner before him on 24.02.2026 at the earliest preferably within a period of 15 days. 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly grant any other writ/ writs, order/ orders, relief/ reliefs in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. At the outset, counsel for petitioner submits that she is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 24.02.2026, at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Counsel for the State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of the case, writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE