1 2026:CGHC:13112-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 151 of 2026 Dilip Karkel S/o Sahuram Aged About 33 Years R/o Village C.S.E.B Colony Dodipaara, Police Station Pu.S.K. C.S.E.B District Korba Chhattisgarh Through His Brother In Law Kuldeep Lahre Son Of Ramprasad Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Awas Para Sodhar, Police Station And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Home (Jail) Mahanadi Naya Raipur, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Jail Superintendent Central Jail Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The District Magistrate District Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent of Police District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Goswami, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19.03.2026 1. Heard Mr. Rahul Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 “10.1 To call for entire records from respondents pertaining to petitioners leave case for kind perusal of the Hon’ble High Court. 10.2 To quash impugned memo dated 05.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) and also to direct respondents to release petitioner on parole under the Chhattisgarh Prisoner’s Leave Rules 1989. 10.3 That the petitioner wishes to obtain 14 days leave to visit his family who also misses him greatly. 10.4 To grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner states he does not want to press this petition and he wishes to file fresh sureties for release of the petitioner to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. 4. In view of the same, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra