( 2026:JHHC:18910 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4148 of 2026 Taslim Ansari @ Aryan @ Md. Taslim Ansari son of late Dilawar Ansari @ Late Dilawar Miyan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 2, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, APP --- 03/29.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338,336(3), 61(2) and 3/5 of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned, A.C.J.M., Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 15.02.2026. Charge sheet has been submitted on 11.05.2026. He further submits that informant belongs to the State of Maharashtra and as per the allegations she met the petitioner and the petitioner told her that he can marry her male relatives if they are not getting married with girls and for that the petitioner demanded Rs. 2,50,000/- and was fully paid. On being paid, the informant brought her relatives at Koderma railway station and thereafter to Sagar Hotel, where they met the manager of the said hotel. Petitioner also assured them to get marry with nice girls but they were defrauded. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioner has obtained money from the informant and postponed marriage and thereafter fled away with the girl. The case relates to human trafficking. 5. However, the fact that charge sheet has been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent is not in dispute. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge sheet has also been submitted and the ( 2026:JHHC:18910 ) 2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.06.2026 Uploaded on 01.07.2026 Binit/