Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18407 (AP)

D VENKATESWARA RAJU v. SRI PRAVEEN PRAKASH IAS

CC/1828/2024 · 2026-02-26

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RC,J CC No.1828 of 2024 1 APHC010112412024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1828/2024 Between: 1. D VENKATESWARA RAJU, S/O VENKATA RAMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 59 YEAR. OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR LOTUS LAND MARK, SECTOR NO-3, ROAD NO-3, BLUEBERRY APARTMENT, FLAT NO. 401. AYODHYA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PRAVEEN PRAKASH IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHRI S S RAWAT I A S, PRINICPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI K NARASIMHA MURTHY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC) GUNTUR 4. ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNA ...CONTEMNOR(S): RC,J CC No.1828 of 2024 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed respondents 5 and 6, in the above C.C.No.1828 of 2024 and other miscellaneous applications therein, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to discharge respondent no.1 from CC. 1828/2024 in the interest of justice and may be pleased to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Delete/discharge the name of the respondent No. 2 from the array of respondents in the CC.No.1828/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. PRASANTHI GUDE 2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3. V CH NAIDU 4. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: ORDER Sri Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this RC,J CC No.1828 of 2024 3 Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and nothing remains for adjudication and this Contempt Case may be closed. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 27th February, 2026. RR