the commissioner of sales tax, maharashtra state,mum v. m/s uday udyog
STR/88/2017 · 2026-10-14
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18402 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18402 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12.STR-88-2017.DOC Gauri Gaekwad IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 88 OF 2017 IN REFERENCE APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 1999 The Commissioner of Sales Tax …Applicant Versus M/s. Uday Udyog …Respondent Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM:
SUMAN SHYAM & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATED:
14th OCTOBER 2026. PC:-
1. In terms of our order dated 7th October, 2026 passed in this matter, Mr. Takke, learned AGP, has verified the records and confirms that, under the Amnesty Scheme, the Assessee has paid the amount of disputed tax. As such, nothing survives in this Sales Tax Reference.
2. Taking note of the submission of the learned AGP, this Sales Tax Reference stands disposed of. GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2026.10.14 18:21:35 +0530
12.STR-88-2017.DOC
3. The question of law, if any, shall remain open to be answered in appropriate proceedings.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) {