Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18400 (PNJ)

ANMOL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5974/2026 · 2026-05-22

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5974-20 IN THE H (108 ) ANMOL AND A STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. Ms. MANISHA BAT 1. The Constitution of In official responde petitioners at the representation da 2. At t submitted that t 11.05.2026 befo (Mohali) (Annex present petition b been taken thereo 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat AND ANOTHER Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Dinesh Bhardwaj, Advocate an Ms. Kriti Bansal, Advocate for the p Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG ****  BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a writ o spondents No.2 and 3 to protect th at the hands of respondent No.4 an tion dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Senior Superintendent (Annexure P-5) raising their grievan tition but the same has not yet been co thereon. He further submitted that at t AND HARYANA AT CRWP-5974-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA  ate and r the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the tect the life and liberty of the o.4 and to take action on their 5). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on endent of Police, SAS Nagar rievances as mentioned in the een considered and no action has hat at this stage, the petitioners AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5974-20 would be satisfie Senior Superinte aforesaid represe thereon. 3. Noti 4. Ms. notice on behalf be done in due c her during the co 5. In v commenting any disposed of at th aforesaid represe within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec  22.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) satisfied if appropriate directions are i perintendent of Police, SAS Nagar epresentation filed by the petitioners Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ehalf of the respondents-State and su due course. Let a complete set of the the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 11.05.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye    s are issued to respondent No.2- Nagar (Mohali) to decide the ioners and take necessary action nior DAG, Punjab, has advance and submits that the needful will of the paperbook be supplied to made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.