RAFIQUE ANSARI ALIAS MD. RAFIQUE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./627/2026 · 2026-03-25
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 184 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 184 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8485
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 627 of 2026 Rafique Ansari @ Md. Rafique, aged about 50 years, son of Md. Kayum Ansari @ Kayum Ansari, Resident of Village-Mamaahari, PO- Khorimahua, PS-Dhanwar, Dist.-Giridih ... … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Sohel Ansari, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, APP
--------
Order No. 03 /Dated: 25th March 2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS in connection with Dhanwar PS Case No. 185 of 2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that the petitioner and informant are agnates and there is free fight in between the parties and it is the informant party who were the aggressor. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.11.2025 as such the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the allegation which is general and omnibus coupled with the fact that there was a free-fight in between the parties for land, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J. M. 1st
2026:JHHC:8485
2
Class, Giridih in connection with Dhanwar PS Case No. 185 of 2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner.
7.
Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th March 2026 Amit Uploaded on 26/03/2026