Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18396 (RAJ)

PRIYANKA MAHESHWARI D/O LATE SMT. MANJU DEVI MAHEHWARI v. HAMID S/O CHAND KHAN

CMA/3764/2019 · 2026-01-30

Ashutosh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:8418] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3764/2019 Priyanka Maheshwari, Aged About 40 Years, D/o. Late Smt. Manju Devi Mahehwari, Resident of Rajpath Marg, Opposite Old Police Station, Sambherlake, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Claimant-Appellant Versus 1. Hamid S/o. Chand Khan, Resident of Nakasha Mohalla, Sambherlake, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Driver And Owner of Vehicle Auto No. RJ-37PA-0399) 2. Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Plot No. 9 Basant Vihar, Gopalpura Flyover, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. Brij Mohan Ajmera S/o. Late Shri Gulab Chand Ajmera, Resident of Old Bus Stand, Rajpath Marg, Sambherlake, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents-Non-Claimants For Appellant(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal, Adv. (for Insurance Company) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Judgment 30/01/2026 1- vihykfFkZ;k }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k] lkaHkj ysd] ftyk&t;iqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&229@2008] fiz;adk ekgs'ojh cuke gehn o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 29-04-2019 ¼ftls vkxs ^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- vihykfFkZ;k }kjk eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa mldh ekrk eatw nsoh dh e`R;q gks tkus ds QyLo:i 1]22]80]000@& #i;s {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (2 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;kph dks dqy 16]11]276@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 7-5 izfr'kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA 3- ;|fi vihykfFkZ;k us ;g vihy vU; vk/kkjksa ij gh is'k dh gS] fdUrq fo}ku vf/koDrk us cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ fy;k gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rdk dh fu/kkZfjr vk; ij Hkfo"; esa gkssus okyh vk; dh c<+ksrjh ds en esa 10 izfr'kr dh Hkfo"; o`f) dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk e`rdk 54 o"khZ; jktdh; deZpkjh Fkh] ftldh fu/kkZfjr vk; ij 15 izfr'kr dh Hkfo"; o`f) fd;k tkuk visf{kr FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk dalksfVZ;e dh en esa o lEink dh gkfu ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k vihykfFkZ;k dks ugha fnyokbZ x;h gS rFkk vafre laLdkj dh en esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftlesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk chek dEiuh dks {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds nkf;Ro ls eqDr fd;k tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gS] tcfd chek dEiuh dks {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds nkf;Ro ls eqDr ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy dks Lohdkj fd;k tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA 4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls vihykfFkZ;k ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh }kjk U;k;ky; dk /;ku fuEu U;kf;d n`"Vkar dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;k x;k %& ● K. Nagendra Vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in [2025] 8 Supreme 378. 5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (3 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] 6- i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd ekeys dh ?kVuk fnukad 27-10-2008 dh crkbZ x;h gS rFkk oDr ?kVuk e`rdk dks jktdh; izkFkfed fo|ky; esa v/;kfidk ds in ij inLFkkfir gksuk crkrs gq, izfrekg 22]000@& #i;s osru izkIr djuk crk;k x;k gSA vihykfFkZ;k }kjk e`rdk dh vk; ds laca/k ofj"B mi ftyk f'k{kk vf/kdkjh ,oa CykWd izkjfEHkd f'k{kk vf/kdkjh lkaHkj ysd }kjk tkjh osru izek.k i= izn'kZ&15 fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k i=koyh ij is'k fd;k x;k] ftlds vuqlkj ekg flrEcj] 2008 esa e`rdk dk dqy ldy osru 21]987@& #i;s FkkA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rdk ds osru izek.k i= izn'kZ&15 ij fo'okl djrs gq, e`rdk dh ekfld vk; 21]987@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr dh x;hA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rdk dh vk; ds laca/k esa fudkys x;s mDr fu"d"kZ esa ge dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA fdUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rdk dh mijksDr fu/kkZfjr ekfld vk; ij e`rdk dh vk;q dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, 10 izfr'kr dh Hkfo"; o`f) dh x;h gSA tcfd oDr ?kVuk e`rdk 54 o"kZ vk;q dh osru Hkksxh efgyk FkhA ,slh fLFkfr esa us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke iz.k; lsBh o vU; fjiksVZsM bu ¼2017½ 16 ,l-lh-lh- 680 ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh vk; dh c<+ksrjh ds en esa 15 izfr'kr dh Hkfo"; o`f) fd;k tkuk visf{kr FkkA rn~uqlkj 21]987@& #i;s dk 15 izfr'kr 3]298@& #i;s gksrk gSA mDr 15 izfr'kr jkf'k dks e`rdk dh fu/kkZfjr ekfld vk; esa tksM+s tkus ds mijkar e`rdk dh dqy ekfld vk; 25]285@& #i;s gksrh gS] tks {kfriwfrZ ds fu/kkZj.k dk vk/kkj jgsxhA 7- oDr ?kVuk e`rdk ij dsoyek= mldh iq=h dks vkfJr gksuk crk;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk oDr ?kVuk e`rdk ij vkfJrksa dh la[;k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, e`rdk ds O;fDrxr [kpZ dh dVkSrh ds en esa 1@2 Hkkx dh dVkSrh dh x;h gS tks mfpr izrhr gksrh gSA rn~uqlkj 25]285@& #i;s dk 1@2 Hkkx 12]643@& #i;s gksrk gS] ftls fu/kkZfjr ekfld vk; esa ls ?kVkus ds mijkar vkfJr vk; dh 'ks"k jkf'k 12]643@& #i;s gksrh gSA oDr ?kVuk e`rdk dh vk;q 54 o"kZ fu/kkZfjr dh x;h gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ljyk oekZ o vU; cuke nsgyh VªklaiksVZ dkWiksZjs'ku o vU; fjiksVsZM bu [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (4 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] ¼2009½ 6 ,l-lh-lh- 121 rFkk iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vk/kkj ij e`rdk dh vk;q dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, 11 dk xq.kd yxk;k tkuk visf{kr gSA 8- rn~uqlkj e`rdk dh fu/kkZfjr ekfld vk; 12]643@& #i;s ds vk/kkj ij vihykfFkZ;k dks gksus okyh vkfJr vk; dh dqy {kfr 12]643 x 12 x 11 = 16]68]876@& #i;s gksrh gS] tks vihykfFkZ;k izkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh gSA 9- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rdk dh iq=h vihykfFkZ;k fiz;adk dks dalksfVZ;e dh en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ o ;wukbZVsM bf.M;k ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke lfrUnj dkSj mQZ lrfoUnj dkSj o vU; fjiksVsZM bu ¼2021½ 11 ,llhlh 780 o vU; U;kf;d n`"Vkar esxek tujy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke ukuw jke mQZ pqg: jke o vU; fjiksVsZM bu ¼2018½ 18 ,llhlh 130 ds ekeyksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj izR;sd vkfJr dks 40]000@& #i;s dalksfVZ;e dh en esa fnyok;s tkus dk fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA 10- bl laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr ds vuqlkj e`rd ds vkfJrx.k dks dalksfVZ;e dh en esa] vafre laLdkj o lEink dh gkfu ds en esa nh tkus okyh fu/kkZfjr jkf'k esa izR;sd 03 o"kZ esa 10 izfr'kr jkf'k dh c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA blfy, bl ekeys esa Hkh mDr enksa esa 10 izfr'kr dh o`f) dh tkdj vihykfFkZ;k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fnyokbZ tkosA 11- tgka rd dalksfVZ;e dh en esa] vafre laLdkj rFkk lEink dh gkfu ds en esa e`rd ds vkfJrx.k dks fnyokbZ tkus okyh fu/kkZfjr jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dk iz'u gS rks bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n`"Vkar glhuk ;kLehu o vU; cuke us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM o vU; fjiksVsMZ bu 2025 ,l-lh-lh- vkWuykbZu ,l-lh- 2919 esa fuEufyf[kr er O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd %& [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (5 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] "7. According to us, the Constitution Bench decision only provided for an enhancement of 10% in every three-year period with respect to accidents which occurred after 2017, the first enhancement being applied in 2020. Otherwise, as is indicated in the cited decision; which we find, with due respect, difficult to accept, the accident in 2010 is applied with a 10% increase when it is disposed of in 2020 and a further 10% increase if the matter is finally disposed of in 2023. This with due respect is not the purport of the decision in Pranay Sethi1, as we understand it. There cannot be any enhancement made with respect to an accident which occurred in the year 1998, since the compensation for loss of estate and consortium as also expenses incurred for funeral is as on that date, which has been standardized by Pranay Sethi at 15,000/-, 40,000/- & 15,000/-, the delay in payment of which is compensated by the interest directed to be paid." 12- gLrxr ekeys dh ?kVuk o"kZ 2008 dh crkbZ x;h gSA ,slh fLFkfr ;g U;k;ky;] ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar glhuk ;kLehu ¼mijksDr½] iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½] lfrUnj dkSj mQZ lrfoUnj dkSj ¼mijksDr½ o ukuw jke mQZ pqg: jke ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeyksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj ?kVuk dh frfFk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq,] e`rdk dh iq=h nkokdrkZ@vihykfFkZ;k fiz;adk dks ^^iSjs.Vy dalksfVZ;e** dh en esa 40]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rh gSA 13- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykfFkZ;k dks vafre laLdkj dh en esa 15]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS tks iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj mfpr izrhr gksrh gS] blesa ge dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA 14- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykfFkZ;k dks lEink dh gkfu ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA vr% lEink dh gkfu ds en esa ge] iz.k; lsBh ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj 15]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k vihykfFkZ;k dks fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (6 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] 15- fo}ku vf/kdj.k us vkWVks la[;k&vkj-ts&37&ih-,&0399 ¼ftls vkxs ^iz'uxr okgu* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds pkyd }kjk :V ijfeV dk mYya?ku fd;s tkus ds dkj.k chek ikWfylh dh 'krksaZ dk mYya?ku gksus ls chek dEiuh dks {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds nkf;Ro ls mUeqDr fd;k x;k gSA 16- bl laca/k esa chek dEiuh }kjk ;g rdZ fy;k x;k gS fd iz'uxr okgu pkyd ds ikl iz'uxr okgu vkWVks dks oDr ?kVuk] nq?kZVukLFky ij lapkfyr djus dk oS/k o izHkkoh ijfeV ugha Fkk] bl dkj.k chek ikWfylh dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku gksus ls chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds fy, ftEesnkj ugha gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk chek dEiuh dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k vnk;xh ds nkf;Ro ls mUeqDr fd;s tkus esa dksbZ fof/kd =qfV dkfjr ugha dh x;h gSA 17- bl laca/k esa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd gLrxr ekeys ds rF;ksas ds vuqlkj iz'uxr okgu dks pykus dk ijfeV okgu Lokeh ds ikl Fkk] fdUrq mDr ijfeV ftl {ks= esa lapkyu ds fy, Fkk] ml LFkku ls nwj tkdj iz'uxr okgu dk lapkyu fd;k tk jgk FkkA bl izdkj ijfeV dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku ekurs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k us chek dEiuh dks {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds nkf;Ro ls mUeqDr fd;k gS] tks fd =qfViw.kZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykfFkZ;k dh vksj ls U;k;ky; dk /;ku R.K. College Versus Ramesh Chand & Ors. reported in 2007 0 Supreme (Raj) 796 dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;k x;kA jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk R.K. College (supra) ds ekeys esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd %& "12. It is to be imbibed that an Insurance Company assumes a particular risk as per the terms of the insurance contract; and in the vehicular insurance, such contract of insurance is conditioned by the requirements of statute particularly those of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. An Insurance Company that has assumed the risk in relation to a motor vehicle, while resisting any claim for [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (7 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] compensation wherein any amount of award is to become payable by it, has been permitted to defend the action on limited grounds as enumerated in Section 149(2) of the Act. The clause permitting a defence to the insurer in relation to the permit for use of a transport vehicle as contained in Section 149(2)(a)(i)(c) could be read, omitting other phrases not relevant for the present purpose, in the following manner:- "(2)…….and an insurer ……shall be entitled …… to defend the action on any of the following grounds, namely:— (a) that there has been a breach of a specified condition of the policy, being one of the following conditions, namely:— (i) a condition excluding the use of the vehicle— …. …. …. (c) for a purpose not allowed by the permit under which the vehicle is used, where the vehicle is a transport vehicle," 13. It is at once clear that the defence available to the vehicle insurer is NOT of violation of terms of permit BUT of breach of some specified conditions of insurance policy, as detailed out in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 149 of the Act. In relation to the permit for a transport vehicle, the breach (of insurance policy) envisaged by the statutory provision is of using the vehicle for a purpose other than that allowed by the permit.” 14. XXXX 15. XXXX 16. XXXX 17. For the purpose of present case, if the vehicle was found on a route not covered under the permit, it might be a case of violation of conditions of permit; but it cannot be said that by such fact alone, there occurred a breach of insurance policy condition. As noticed, the policy condition itself has been to use the vehicle only under a contract carriage/stage carriage permit. The defence available to the insurer under Sub-clause (c) of Section 149(2)(a)(i) is of breach of such a policy condition that excludes the use of vehicle for a purpose' not allowed by the permit under which the [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (8 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] vehicle is used. It is not the case of the insurer that the vehicle was not being used as a contract carriage or was being used for 'any purpose' other than that envisaged by the permit Ex.NA-2. Merely because the permit stated a condition that the vehicle would not be plied on nationalised route and violation of such condition of the permit is alleged, the same is not even a remote allegation on violation of insurance policy conditions; and is not of a defence permitted to the insurer by the statute. The principles noticed and expounded in Mohni Bai's case (supra) do directly apply to the present case too; and the decision in Challa Bharathamma's case (supra) is of no application because that was a case of the vehicle having no permit at all." 18- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh dh vksj ls rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us U;kf;d n`"Vkar K. Nagendra Vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. reported in [2025] 8 Supreme 378 esa ;g er izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd ;fn fdlh okgu dks fuf'pr :V ij okgu pykus dk ijfeV iznku fd;k x;k gks vkSj mDr okgu fu/kkZfjr :V ls fHkUu :V ij tkdj nq?kZVuk dkfjr djrk gS rks ijfeV dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku djrk gS vkSj ijfeV dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;s tkus ls chek ikWfylh dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku ekuk tkosxk] ,slh fLFkfr eas chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds fy, mRrjnk;h ugha gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us U;kf;d n`"Vkar K. Nagendra (supra) ds ekeys esa fuEufyf[kr fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd %& "9. The purpose of an insurance policy in the present context is to shield the owner/operator from direct liability when such an unforeseen/unfortunate incident takes place. To deny the victim/dependents of the victim compensation simply because the accident took place outside the bounds of the permit and, therefore, is outside the purview of the insurance policy, would be offensive to the sense of justice, for the accident itself is for no fault of his. Then, the [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (9 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] insurance company most certainly ought to pay. 10. At the same time though, when an insurance company takes on a policy and accepts payments of premium in pursuance thereto, it agrees to do so within certain bounds. The contract lays down the four corners within which such an insurance policy would operate. If that is the case, to expect the insurer to pay compensation to a third party, which is clearly outside the bounds of the said agreement would be unfair. Balancing the need for payment of compensation to the victim vis-a-vis the interests of the insurer, the order of the High Court applying the pay and recover principle, in our considered view, is entirely justified and requires no interference." 19- bl izdkj jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk R.K. College (supra) ds ekeys esa fuEufyf[kr fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd ;fn iz'uxr okgu pkyd ds ikl ijfeV Fkk] fdUrq iz'uxr okgu pkyd }kjk mDr ijfeV esa fn;s x;s :V ls fHkUu :V ij tkdj nq?kZVuk dkfjr dh x;h gS rks Hkh chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh ds fy, mRrjnk;h gS] D;ksafd ijfeV dk ugha gksuk chek ikWfylh dh 'krZ dk mYya?ku gS] fdUrq ijfeV dh 'krZ dk mYya?ku gksuk chek ikWfylh dh 'krZ dk mYya?ku gksuk ugha ekuk tkosxkA fdUrq ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk K. Nagendra (supra) ds ekeys esa ;g Li"V dj fn;k gS fd ;fn ijfeV esa fn;s x;s :V ls fHkUu :V ij tkdj okgu dk lapkyu fd;k tkrk gS rks :V dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;s tkus ls Hkh chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ vnk;xh dh mRrjnk;h ugha gS] fdUrq r`rh; i{kdkj dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds mís'; ls chek dEiuh dks vknsf'kr fd;k tk ldrk gS fd og vkgrx.k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k vnk djs o mlds mijkar vnk dh x;h jkf'k dks iz'uxr okgu Lokeh o pkyd ls olwy dj ysosA 20- mijksDr leLr foospu ds vk/kkj ij ge bl fu"d"kZ ij igqWprs gSa fd pwafd gLrxr ekeys esa LohÑr :i ls iz'uxr okgu dks uxjikfydk [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (10 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] {ks= edjkuk] ftyk ukxkSj esa lapkyu gsrq ijfeV tkjh fd;k x;k Fkk] tcfd gLrxr ekeys dh ?kVuk nwljs ftys vFkkZr t;iqj esa lkaHkj ysd ds ikl fLFkfr nso;kuh xkao esa ?kfVr gqbZ gSA bl izdkj iz'uxr okgu ijfeV esa crk;s x;s :V ls fHkUu :V ij pydj nq?kZVukxzLr gqvk gSA bl izdkj K. Nagendra (supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vk/kkj ij chek dEiuh dks ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd chek dEiuh izFker% nkokdrkZ@vihykfFkZ;k dks fu/kkZfjr {kfriwfrZ jkf'k vnk djs o mlds mijkar vnk dh x;h {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dks iz'uxr okgu pkyd o Lokeh izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ls olwy dj ysosA 21- mDrkuqlkj vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV fuEu izdkj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh gS %& Øe la- 'kh"kZ@en bl fu.kZ; ds rgr fu/kkZfjr dh x;h jkf’k ¼:i;s esa½ 1- vkfJr vk; dh {kfr ds en esa 16]68]876@& 2- dalksfVZ;e ds en esa dqy 40]000@& 3- vafre laLdkj ds en esa 15]000@& 4- lEink dh gkfu ds en esa 15]000@& bl U;k;ky; }kjk fu/kkZfjr dh xbZ dqy {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 17]38]876@& fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyokbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ¼&½ 16]11]276@& c<+ksrjh i'pkr {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa varj 1]27]600@& 22- rnuqlkj vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV }kjk izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr iapkV] ftlds }kjk vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV dks 16]11]276@& :i;s fnyok;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ds LFkku ij 17]38]876@& :i;s dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV dks ns; {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij fu;ekuqlkj vk;dj dVkSrh dh tk,xhA vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf’k dks iapkV jkf’k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkdj 'ks"k jkf’k vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV izkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh jgsxhA 23- bl vkns'k }kjk c<+kbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij ;kfpdk nk;j djus dh frfFk ls vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV] 08 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt izkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh gSA [2026:RJ-JP:8418] (11 of 11) [CMA-3764/2019] 24- chek dEiuh }kjk vihykfFkZ;k@DysesaV dks vnk dh xbZ izfrdj jkf’k] jsLiksaMsaV@chek dEiuh] okgu Lokeh@pkyd izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 ls olwy djus dh vf/kdkjh gksxhA 25- rnuqlkj ;g vihy fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA 26- lHkh yfEcr izkFkZuk&i=ksa dks Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J LOKESH RAJ /89-S