[2026:RJ-JP:5650] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No.424/2025 In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.306/2022 Saurabh S/o Shri Mukesh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Kherthal, Tehsil Kisangarhbas, Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Yashwant S/o Shrichand, R/o Jhadka, Ps-Kherthal, Tehsil-Kotkasim, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) Vehicle Driver M.c. Bajaj Platina Registration No. Rj-32-Sa-8332. 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Arjun Singh, R/o Khalilpuri, Tehsil-Tijara, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) Owner Vehicle M.c. Bajaj Platina Registration No. Rj-32-Sa-8332. Purchaser Through Agreement. 3. Amar Singh S/o Bhagwanaram, R/o Khedki Birbhan Ramsinghpura, Tehsil-Kotputli, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) Registered Owner Vehicle M.c. Bajaj Platina Registration No. Rj-32-Sa-8332. 4. Insurance Company Unidentified, M.c Bajaj Platina Registration No. Rj-32-Sa-8332. 5. Mukesh Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Sundarlal Gupta, R/o Ward No. 10, Kherthal, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, Alwar, (Raj.) Owner Vehicle Mc No. Rj-02-Su-9411. 6. United India Insurnce Company Ltd., Through Branch Manager Charch Road, Alwar, Distt .alwar (Raj) Cover Note No. 930725 Insurance Period From 24-1-2011 To 23-11-2012, Insurer Vehicle Mc No. Rj-02-Su-9411. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/02/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:5650] (2 of 3) [CRES-424/2025] 1. The instant restoration application has been submitted for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.306/2022 to its original number. 2. Counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that when the appeal was listed before the Court on 22.03.2023, the same was dismissed in default for want of appearance of the counsel. Counsel submits that on the fateful day, counsel for the appellant could not appear due to the circumstances beyond his control, hence, the case was dismissed in default. Counsel submits that important questions of law and facts are involved in the main appeal, hence, the same is liable to be decided on its merits after restoring the same to its original number. 3. Heard the submissions. 4. The instant restoration application has been submitted with an inordinate delay of 839 days along with an application submitted under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay. 5. This Court is not satisfied with the explanation given for the inordinate delay of 839 days, however, looking to the fact that important questions of law and facts are involved in the main appeal, the application submitted under Section 5 of the Limitation Act as well as the instant restoration application stand allowed with the direction to the applicants-appellants to deposit a sum of Rs.2500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five Hundred only) with the Munshi Welfare Association, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur within a period of seven days from today [2026:RJ-JP:5650] (3 of 3) [CRES-424/2025] and the said amount would be utilized for the welfare of the Advocates’ Clerks. 6. In case, receipt of the cost i.e. Rs.2500/- is furnished by the applicants-appellants in the Registry, the Registry is directed to restore the S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.306/2022 to its original number and proceed further. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/95