Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18395 (PNJ)

AMIT KAIRON v. SONIKA DALAL AND OTHERS

TA/135/2026 · 2026-05-15

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 106 Amit Kair Sonika Da CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. applicant- GW/36/202 20 of the H referred to Kairon and District & jurisdiction 2. respondent predecesso against ex TA-135-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Transfer Application No Date of decision :-15.05 t Kairon Versus ka Dalal and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Dhruv Sihag, Advocate for the applicant. Respondent proceeded against 06.4.2026). HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present Transfer Applica -husband seeking transfer of 36/2023 filed by respondents No.1 an f the Hindu Adoptions and Maintena red to as “the Act”), titled as “Son on and another”, presently pending b ict & Sessions Judge, Kaithal, to diction at Hisar. Despite service, none appe ndents. Consequently, vide order dat ecessor Bench of this Court, the res ex-parte. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.135 of 2026 (O & M) .05.2026 …..Applicant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA gainst ex-parte (vide order dated pplication has been filed by the er of petition bearing No. o.1 and 2 under Sections 18 and intenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter “Sonika and another vs. Amit ding before the Court of learned al, to a Court of competent appeared on behalf of the er dated 06.04.2026 passed by a the respondents were proceeded VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.18 19.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. marriage b on 09.05.20 01.05.2018 matrimonia the year 20 4. between th are as unde 5. respondent information Chandigarh between th Sections 18 TA-135-2026 (O & M) Learned counsel for the ap iage between the applicant and respon 9.05.2017 and one daughter was born 5.2018, who is presently residing wit imonial discord, the parties have bee ear 2019. It has further been submitte een the parties are already pending at s under:- (i) FIR No.224 dated 04.0 406, 498-A and 506 Station Azad Nagar, H (ii) A petition under Sectio to be dismissed in 16.12.2022; (iii) Proceedings under the Domestic Violence A complaint was dismi application for restor pending at Hisar; and (iv) A petition filed by th Section 13 of the Hin also pending at Hisar. Learned counsel for the app ndent No.1 was earlier residing a mation available with the applicant, s digarh. It is, thus, contended that s een the parties are already pending a ons 18 and 20 of the Act pending at 2 the applicant submits that the respondent No.1 was solemnized s born out of the said wedlock on g with respondent No.1. Due to e been residing separately since bmitted that multiple litigations ding at Hisar. The details thereof d 04.06.2019 under Sections 323, d 506 IPC registered at Police gar, Hisar; Section 125 Cr.P.C., which came d in default vide order dated er the Protection of Women from nce Act, wherein the original dismissed in default and an restoration thereof is presently ; and by the applicant-husband under e Hindu Marriage Act, which is isar. e applicant further submits that ding at Hisar and, as per the icant, she is presently residing at that since the major litigations ding at Hisar, the petition under ing at Kaithal also deserves to be VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.18 19.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document transferred convenienc 6. gone throug 7. were proce account of reveals that between th proceeding litigation a of justice a 8. this Court application directions: TA-135-2026 (O & M) ferred either to Hisar or to Chandig enience of respondent No.1. I have heard learned counsel through the record with his assistance A perusal of the order sheets proceeded against ex-parte vide o unt of their failure to appear despite als that several proceedings arising out een the parties are already pending eedings at one place would not o tion and conflicting proceedings, but stice and facilitate convenience of the Keeping in view the aforesai Court deems it appropriate to al cation. Accordingly, the same is allow tions:- a) Petition bearing No respondents No.1 and 2 of the Hindu Adoptio 1956, titled “Sonika an and another”, pending District & Sessions Ju to a Court of competen b) The learned District Ju transmit the entire aforesaid case to the le forthwith. 3 handigarh, keeping in view the unsel for the applicant and have stance. heets shows that the respondents ide order dated 06.04.2026 on spite service. The record further ng out of the matrimonial dispute nding at Hisar. Consolidation of not only avoid multiplicity of s, but would also serve the ends of the parties. oresaid facts and circumstances, to allow the present transfer s allowed subject to the following g No. GW/36/2023 filed by 1 and 2 under Sections 18 and 20 doptions and Maintenance Act, ika and another vs. Amit Kairon nding before the Court of learned ons Judge, Kaithal, is transferred petent jurisdiction at Hisar. trict Judge, Kaithal is directed to ntire record pertaining to the the learned District Judge, Hisar VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.18 19.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9. of the respo vide order interest of them. Acco through reg Parties. A c Judges con 10. is also dire on the date May 15, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo TA-135-2026 (O & M) c) The parties are direc learned District & S 16.06.2026. d) Upon receipt of the r Judge, Hisar shall assi of competent jurisdictio Since the present petition is be e respondents, who have already been order dated 06.04.2026, it is cons est of justice, to ensure due intimati . Accordingly, a copy of this order gh registered post at the addresses m es. A copy of this order be also forwa es concerned through e-mail for necess The applicant, through learned so directed to ensure his appearance b e date fixed. Disposed of accordingly. , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 4 directed to appear before the & Sessions Judge, Hisar on the record, the learned District ll assign the matter to the Court isdiction in accordance with law. n is being decided in the absence been proceeded against ex-parte considered appropriate, in the ation of the present order to order be sent to the respondents sses mentioned in the Memo of forwarded to the learned District necessary compliance. learned counsel present in Court, rance before the transferee Court ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.18 19.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document