Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18391 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR SON OF SHRI DALIP SINGH YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/807/2025 · 2026-01-27

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3468] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 807/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6678/2023 Anil Kumar Son Of Shri Dalip Singh Yadav, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Shriyani, Tehsil-Neemrana, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Shri Rahul Katakey, Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Shri Prashant Kiran, Superintendent Of Police Bhiwadi (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Fenin, Adv. for Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG, Ms. Almas Khanam, Adv. & Mr. Akshita Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Bhuwnash Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/01/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 03.05.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6678/2023, whereby order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the respondents accepting voluntary retirement of the petitioner was stayed. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of reply to the contempt petition, submits that after interim order [2026:RJ-JP:3468] (2 of 2) [CCP-807/2025] dated 03.05.2023, the petitioner again submitted an application dated 15.06.2023 seeking voluntary retirement and also stated that he did not want any benefit of order of this Court. 3. In the light of above, no case of deliberate and willful disobedience and no case of contempt is also made out, hence, the contempt petition is dismissed and notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /15