SHAMSHER ANSARI ALIAS SAMASER ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5893/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18382 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18382 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:18923] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5893 of 2026
Shamsher Ansari @ Samaser Ansari, aged about 19 years, S/o Anish Ansari, R/o Village Kudaga Kala, P.O. & P.S. Chainpur, Dist.- Palamau
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl. PP
02 / 29.06.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 127/2026 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case no. 194/2025 instituted under Section 103(1), 238, 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed murder of Nizamuddin Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 23 of the bail application and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion, as on one occasion, he threatened the deceased to be killed within a month and the occurrence took place within a month, from the date of said threatening. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 13.10.2025, as mentioned in para 24 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to
annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Palamau in connection with S.T. No. 127/2026 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case no. 194/2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 29.06.2026
Smita/-