[2026:RJ-JP:12974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4090/2026 Baltatar Son Of Lokman, Resident Of Village Khaidar Kudinna, Police Station Sone Ka Gurja District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 61/2025 registered at Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 117(2), 109(1), 110, 352 & 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that co-accused persons Hari Singh, Rambabu, Malkhan @ Malkhe, Bhuri have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide orders dated 03.02.2026, 03.02.2026 and 10.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 14596/2025, 16816/2025 and 3096/2026 respectively; petitioner is behind the bars since 09.02.2026; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no [2026:RJ-JP:12974] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4090/2026] fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 09.02.2026; co- accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Baltatar S/o Lokman is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application [2026:RJ-JP:12974] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4090/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/81