Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1838 (JHR)

BIKRANT ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1341/2026 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7296 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1341 of 2026 Bikrant Oraon aged about 19 Years S/O Laldeo Oraon R/O Village-Chingri Nawatoli, PO. & P.S.-Bishunpur, District- Gumla (Jharkhand) ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP --- 02/17.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 59/2025 arising out of Bishunpur P.S.Case No. 31/2024, registered for the offence under Section 103(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that it is apparent from para-18 of the case diary that there was a fight between the petitioner and informant’s husband, due to which the informant’s husband fell down and sustained injuries and subsequently succumbed to his injuries. He further submits that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in custody since 23.12.2024; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He lastly submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to para-18 of the case diary, which has been produced before this Court, it appears that there was a fight between the petitioner and the informant’s husband, due to which the victim fell down 2026:JHHC:7296 2 and sustained injuries and subsequently succumbed to his injuries, coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and also the fact that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.12.2024; I am inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Gumla in connection with S.T. Case No. 59/2025 arising out of Bishunpur P.S.Case No. 31/2024. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th March, 2026 jk Uploaded on 18/03/2026