Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18372 (JHR)

IBRAR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3478/2026 · 2026-06-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19047 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3478 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3478 of 2026 ---- 1. Ibrar Ansari, aged about 33 years, S/o Shafique Ansari, R/o village – Karkatta, PO – Malsiring and PS – Pithoria, District – Ranchi 2. Aalam Ansari, aged about 33 years, S/o Jakir Hussain, R/o village – Karkatta, PO – Malsiring and PS – Pithoria, District – Ranchi .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate :- Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate ---- 02/30.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.41 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 132, 238, 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 12(1)(2) of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case alleging that the petitioners have fled away along with other 20 to 25 villagers while the police were investigating. He further submits that although allegations of bovine animals are there, however, no bovine animals have been seized. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.16 of the petition. On these grounds, he 2026:JHHC:19047 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3478 of 2026 submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners are instrumental in taking away 20 to 25 villagers. 5. Considering that the only allegation is made against the petitioners that they have taken away 20 to 25 villagers while interrogation was going on by the police, however, no bovine animals have been seized and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.16 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.41 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 30.06.2026 Sangam/