[2026:RJ-JP:3412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10136/2025 Deepak Lal S/o Baluram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Pagaria Police Station Pagaria District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Deora on behalf of Mr. Kalu Singh Sisodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.253/2025 registered with the Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for offence under Sections 8 and 15 of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated as an accused in the present criminal case on the basis of co-accused from whose possession, the contraband has been recovered. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated and the contraband which has been recovered from co- accused, is less than commercial quantity. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has already joined the investigation. He further prays that the accused-petitioner may be extended the [2026:RJ-JP:3412] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10136/2025] benefit of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application and submits that the allegations against the present accused-petitioner is of involvement in supplying the narcotic drugs. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Anarul SK vs. State of West Bengal, in SLP (Criminal) No.12621/2024, observed as under:- “4. The Grant of anticipatory bail in cases involving Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) is a very serious issue. We, therefore, direct the State to consider as to whether it proposes to file an application for the cancellation of bail granted to the other co-accused.” 6. In view of the observations of the Hon’ble Apex Court, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /233