Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18368 (CHH)

RAM LAL CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12925/2025 · 2026-03-22

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13834 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12925 of 2025 1 - Ram Lal Chaudhary S/o Late Shri I. S. Chaudhary Aged About 63 Years R/o Niwas Tilgi, Post Chikli, Tahsil Pusaur, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Block- 4, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director (Pension) Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan Block- 4, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Under Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Joint Director Office Of The Joint Director Urban Administration And Development, Bilaspur Zone, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Sariya, District : Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Shukla, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 23/03/2026. 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, respondents have issued charge memo for initiating disciplinary proceedings against him, therefore, this writ petition rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. However, petitioner will be at liberty to take recourse of law for initiating further proceeding against him. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram