Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18367 (JHR)

WARISH ALIAS MD. WARISH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5888/2026 · 2026-06-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:18920] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5888 of 2026 Warish @ Md. Warish, son of Abdul Rahim, aged about 32 years, resident of 25, Road No. 05, Zakir Nagar East, Near Behera Maidan, P.O. and P.S. Mango, District East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. J. N. Upadhyay, Adv. For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. PP 02 / 29.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025 instituted under Section 109(1), 308(5), 3(5) of BNS and section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner did reiki for the occurrence. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.04.2026, as mentioned in para 12 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, East Singhbhum in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 29.06.2026 Smita/-