RABINDRA HAIBURU @ RAVINDRA HAIBURU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5941/2026 · 2026-06-30
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18362 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18362 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:19012] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5941 of 2026
------ Rabindra Haiburu @ Ravindra Haibum, aged about 38 years, son of late Bholay Haiburu, resident of village- Raysindri, P.O. and P.S. Kuchai, District Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand, At present village Riding, P.O. and P.S. Kharsawan, District- Seraikella Kharsawan. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-30-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No.14 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 308(5), 351(2), 351(3), 126(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused put the informant in fear of death for committing extortion. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no allegation of any money having been paid nor is there any amount of extortion mentioned anywhere; either in the F.I.R. or in any other document. It is also submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.04.2026 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has
already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.5351 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Seraikella in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No.14 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.06.2026 Saroj/