YASH KUMAR MISHRA ALIAS YASH MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./716/2026 · 2026-02-10
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1836 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1836 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3455
--1-- A.B.A. No. 716 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 716 of 2026
----
1. Yash Kumar Mishra @ Yash Mishra, aged about 23 years, son of Rohit Kumar Mishra, R/o HouseNo.2579, Hill Road near 2 No. Gate CLW, Mihijam, PO and PS – Mihijam, District – Jamtara
2. Akash Hari, aged about 42 years, S/o Dulal Hari, R/o Ward No.2, Hari Para, PO and PS – Mihijam, District - Jamtara
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate
For the State
:- Mrs. Lily Sahay, Advocate
---- 04/10.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.71 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 318(2) (4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Jamtara.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there was an agreement between Mithalesh Srivastava and informant for supply of certain electronic appliances for which Rs.5,71,500/- was paid by the informant to Mithalesh Srivastava. He further submits that Mithalesh Srivastava has already supplied the
2026:JHHC:3455
--2-- A.B.A. No. 716 of 2026
goods worth Rs.1,75,000/- at the shop of the informant and further goods worth Rs.63,650/- were delivered by Mithalesh Srivastava on 20.04.2025 and invoices of those has been considered by this Court in ABA No.6429 of 2025. He then submits that the allegations are there of not delivering of the rest of the goods by Mithalesh Srivastava. He next submits that so far these petitioners are concerned they are the employee of Mithalesh Srivastava and on instruction of Mithalesh Srivastava certain amount has been transferred in the petitioners’ account and that has been subsequently taken by Mithalesh Srivastava. He also submits that Mithalesh Srivastava has already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6429 of 2025. He next submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.16 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that money on instruction of one Mithalesh Srivastava has also been transferred in the account of the petitioners.
5. Considering that the petitioners are said to be employee of Mithalesh Srivastava and Mithalesh Srivastava has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in the aforesaid ABA and it has been pointed out that money transferred on instruction of Mithalesh Srivastava in the account of these petitioners and the money has already been taken by Mithalesh Srivastava and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in
2026:JHHC:3455
--3-- A.B.A. No. 716 of 2026
paragraph No.16 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby
directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.71 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 10.02.2026 Sangam/