Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18359 (JHR)

CHANDAN MAHTHA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3470/2026 · 2026-06-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18981 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3470 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3470 of 2026 ---- Chandan Mahtha, aged about 26 years, S/o Saju Mahtha, R/o village – near Sitla Mandir, Singhwa, PO and PS – Deoghar, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Advocate ---- 02/30.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Deoghar Town P.S. Case No.523 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis that the petitioner is the owner of Maruti Car having the Registration No. JH-15AD-1327 which was used in committing the crime. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the car of this petitioner was used enforcing the informant to get inside the vehicle on the gun point and thereafter 2026:JHHC:18981 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3470 of 2026 snatching of two mobiles and cash amount of Rs.5,200/- from the informant was made and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. The vehicle in question is of the petitioner which was used in the said crime by two of the friends of this petitioner. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 30.06.2026 Sangam/