JAGDISH PRASAD SON OF LATE SHRI HUKAMARAM v. SHRI SHREYA GUHA
CCP/727/2024 · 2026-01-19
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18358 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18358 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2129] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 727/2024 Jagdish Prasad Son Of Late Shri Hukamaram, Resident Of 6/300, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Shreya Guha, Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Dr. Manisha Arora, Commissioner, Transport And Road Safety Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Shri Akhil Arora, Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. Shri Hemant Gera, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. Shri Ram Niwas Mehta, Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer.
6. Dr. Devraj, Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Ashok Bansal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Aaditya Godara, AAAG & Ms. Saba Naaz, Adv. Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Anshuman Singh, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 19/01/2026
1. This contempt petition has been registered on the reference made by Rajathan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal vide
order dated 24.07.2024, for non-compliance of order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the Tribunal in review application No.11/2023. While allowing the review application directions were given to the respondent-department to consider the case of the
[2026:RJ-JP:2129] (2 of 2) [CCP-727/2024] petitioner for promotion by convening review DPC against the vacancy year 2015-16 and to grant all other consequential including pensionary benefits.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents submitted that although, some delay has occurred in administrative process, however, order dated 18.12.2023 passed by the Tribunal has been complied with by the respondents and in compliance one order dated 18.11.2025 has been passed, whereby the petitioner was promoted on the post of Additional Transport Commissioner against the vacancy year 2015-16 and accordingly, pay fixation of the petitioner has also been made vide
order dated 18.11.2025 and thereafter, even payment order has also been issued. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the Pension Department submits that after the aforesaid exercise undertaken by Administrative Department even revised pension payment order has also been issued on 26.11.2025.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for Administrative Department and Pension Department undertake that necessary payment, if any due, pursuant to the orders passed in compliance of order of the Tribunal shall be made to the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today.
4. The orders submitted by learned Additional Advocate General are taken on record.
5. In view of above, no case of deliberate and willful disobedience is made out, hence, the contempt petition is dismissed and notices stand discharged.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /25