Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18358 (CHH)

TEJRAM NAYAK v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2714/2026 · 2026-03-23

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:13937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2714 of 2026 • Tejram Nayak S/o Shri Minketan Nayak Aged About 60 Years Occupation Service Posted As Lecturer (English) At Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Jhal, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Nawapali P O And Tahsil Baramkela District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. District Education Officer Distt. Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 24/03/2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner being aggrieved with the wrong fixation of seniority has submitted multiple representations before the authorities, lastly on 09.09.2025, however, none of the representation of petitioner is considered or decided. Therefore, direction be issued to Respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the pending representation at the earliest within specified time. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing Respondent No. 3 to take decision on the representation of petitioner dated 09.09.2025, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE