Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18355 (JHR)

LAL BAHADUR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2895/2026 · 2026-06-19

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18402 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2895 of 2026 --------- Lal Bahadur Prasad, aged about 63 years, son of Late Kailash Bhagat, resident of village Amhora, P.O. and P.S. Raghunathpur, District Siwan (Bihar); at present residing at Quarter No.181, Sector- III/E, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 4. Binod Bihari Mahto Koylanchal University, Dhanbad through its Vice-Chancellor, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad. 5. Registrar, Binod Bihari Mahto Koylanchal University, Dhanbad, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad. 6. Secretary cum University Representative, Bokaro Mahila College, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro. 7. Governing Body, Bokaro Mahila College, Bokaro through its Secretary, P.O. and P.S Bokaro, District Bokaro. 8. In-charge Principal, Bokaro Mahila College, Bokaro, P.O. and P.S Bokaro, District Bokaro. ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Afaque Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Varun Prabhakar, A.C. to G.P.-III Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate --------- 02/Dated:-19.06.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: (A) For direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and grant and make payment of the following amount payable to the petitioner:- (i) Salary including provident fund contribution for the period from December 2021 to July 2022; (ii) Withheld half salary and provident fund contribution for the period from August 2022 to March 2023; (iii) Due arrear salary and provident fund contribution for the period from April 2023 to August 2023; (iv) Arrears of education fee for the period from 2004 to 2016. (v) Due remuneration of about Rs.30,000/-of five examinations in which the petitioner discharged his duty as Examination Controller. 2026:JHHC:18402 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since counter affidavit has not been filed; as such, interest of justice would be sufficed by directing the respondent-University to look into the matter and forward the claim of the petitioner to the State so that his grievance made in this writ application can be redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the State and University submits that the petitioner may be directed to approach the 6th respondent-Secretary cum University Representative to look into the matter. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application stands disposed of by directing the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent No.6, who shall verify the records of the case vis-à-vis the claim of the petitioner and forward the same within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation to the Registrar of the University i.e. the respondent No.5, who in turn shall forward the same within a further period of 4 weeks to the 3rd respondent, who shall redress the grievance of the petitioner within a further period of 4 weeks. 6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JUNE 19, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 01/07/2026