( 2026:HHC:34707 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1338 of 2026 Decided on: 17th August, 2026 Ramesh Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of communication dated 14.08.2026 and copy of office order dated 12.05.2026 passed by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Lalpani Shimla-1, which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 12.05.2026 reveals that the petitioner has been allowed the benefit of revised emoluments on contract basis as per Government Notification dated 12.01.2022. The Principal of the concerned school where the petitioner is presently 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:34707 ) 2 working has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner for the period he served on contract basis till his regularization, subject to the final outcome of LPA being filed by the State and other legal remedies. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 09.01.2026 passed in CWP No.873 of 2026, titled, Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 17th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)