Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1835 (BOM)

KISAN SAKHARAM MORE AND ORS v. JEEVAN SANDHYA CHS LTD AND ORS

WP/10298/2026 · 2026-08-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka 6-WP-10298-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10298 OF 2026 Kisan Sakharam More and Ors ...Petitioners V/s. Jeevan Sandhya CHS Ltd and Ors ...Respondents ________________ Mr. Avinash Fatangare a/w Ms. Archana Shelar. Mr. Ranvir Shekhawat i/b M/s. Raj Legal for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Ms. Prabha Badadare for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 11 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) The limited grievance raised in the Petition is about non decision of Application Aled by the Petitioners/Disputants for grant of status quo during pendency of the Dispute. It appears that additionally, Application at Exh-5 is Aled for temporary injunction. 2) Mr. Shekhawat, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 to 4 submits that the pleadings in both the Applications are already complete. In that view of the matter, it is for the Petitioners to press both the Applications before the Co-operative Court. In a jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India this Court cannot issue a direction to the Co-operative Court to decide the Page No. 1 of 2 11 August 2026 2026:BHC-AS:33194 Renuka 6-WP-10298-2026.docx Applications preferred by the Petitioners in the time bound manner. Petitioners shall according request the learned Judge of the Co-operative Court to decide both the Applications in an expeditious manner. 3) Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 11 August 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/08/2026 10:46:31