Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18349 (DEL)

RAVI v. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

W.P.(CRL)/2884/2026 · 2026-09-17

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010442822026 + W.P.(CRL) 2884/2026 RAVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev, Mr. Rajesh and Mr. Sandip, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Ranjana, PS Subzi Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 17.09.2026 CRL.M.A. 28912/2026 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2884/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the petitioner’s application seeking parole has been rejected vide order dated 03.09.2026. The said order is extracted as under:- “... 1. That the above said convict has last availed furlough for a period of two weeks w.e.f. 13.04.2026 to 28.04.2026 and no specific ground mentioned except to maintain social ties. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:58:19 2. Further, Police authority has strongly opposed as there is a possibility of a disturbance to law and order and public security in the area cannot be ruled out in the event of the convict’s release. Considering the gravity and heinous nature of the offence committed by the convict, his release on parole is likely to pose a threat to public peace and tranquillity and may lead to law and order issues.” 2. A copy of the aforesaid order has also been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of hearing. 3. In view of the order dated 03.09.2026, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same stands disposed of as rendered infructuous. 4. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order in accordance with law. 5. All rights and contentions are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 Nc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:58:19