2026:JHHC:19083 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3829 of 2026 Suraj Rabidas @ Suraj Ravidas, aged about 22 years, S/o Lal Babu Rabidas, R/o Village- Niche Bazar, Chirkunda, PO and PS- Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP --- 03/30.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2026 in connection with Dhanbad Cyber P.S. Case No.65 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 318 (4), 319 (2), 336 (3), 338, 61 (2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and under Sections 66 (C), 66 (D) of the I. I. Act and the case is pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. He submits that the petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot rather the other co-accused persons have been apprehended along with Sachin Rabidas and certain mobiles and Sims have been recovered from their possession. 4. Learned counsel submits that name of the petitioner has got transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused and it is alleged that the petitioner along with one co-accused, Harish Rabidas used to provide the details of the account holders of the AXIS Bank. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused persons who were apprehended and have been enlarged on regular bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide B.A. Nos.9783 of 2025, 9772 of 2025, 9771 of 2025 and 9782 of 2025. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed. 2026:JHHC:19083 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner has been made accused primarily on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Dhanbad, in connection with Dhanbad Cyber P.S. Case No.65 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 30.06.2026 Uploaded sandeep/