Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:13956
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2748 of 2026 Ravishankar Verma S/o Kejuram Verma Aged About 52 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Kokdi, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Joint Director (Education) Education Division, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shailja Shukla, G.A.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU)
Order on Board 24/03/2026
1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while working on the post of Teacher (LB) was considered for promotion in the DPC held
2 on 16.10.2025 in which he was found suitable for promotion on the post of Head Master, Middle School. Name of the petitioner is also mentioned in the list enclosed along with Annexure-P/1. At the time of counseling for posting, petitioner was not called. Aggrieved with which he made representation before the respondent No. 3 on 13.01.2026, however, till date the same has not been considered and decided, therefore, direction be issued to respondent No. 3 to take decision on the claim of petitioner and to pass appropriate order of her promotion.
2. Learned counsel for State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection.
3. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the parties, nature of grievance raised, the writ petition at this stage is
disposed of directing respondent no. 3 consider and take decision on representation dated 13.01.2026 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the order. Petitioner will be at liberty to submit a fresh comprehensive representation, if she so desire and if such a representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the same along with the pending representation.
4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is
disposed of. Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
JUDGE Saurabh