Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18926] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5894 of 2026
Samsul Ansari aged about 42 years s/o Basil ansari Resident of Village- Kenduatar P.S. Karmatar, District - Jamtara, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Om Prakash Sharma , Adv. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. PP
02 / 29.06.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. case no 117/2025 instituted under Section 310 (2) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity along with the co- accused persons and looted cash of Rs. 25,000/-, gold and silver jewelry and mobile phones of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner has been identified in the TIP. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 25.03.2026, as mentioned in para 11 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that since the petitioner has been identified in the TIP and in view of the serious allegation against the petitioner, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding, if released on
bail and also there is chance of the petitioner tampering with the evidence. It is therefore submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail at this stage. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the chance of his tampering with the evidence and absconding, if released on bail, this Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case where the above-named petitioner be released on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 29.06.2026
Smita/-