Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18345 (RAJ)

SMT. KRISHNA KANWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/22431/2017 · 2026-01-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:89] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22431/2017 1. Smt. Krishna kanwar (since decease) through his legal representatives:- 1/1 Smt. Anand Kavia W/o Shri. Karni Singh, aged about 40 Years, R/o Govind Niwas, Opp. Nindad Mod, Harmada, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Raj). Presently Residing At G-50, Kanak Vrandvan, Gandhi Path West, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. 2. State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur The Commissioner, Jagir & Khud Kast, Government of Rajasthan, Gopalbari, Jaipur. 3. The Collector, Jagir, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Lokesh Sharma Mr.Bhupender Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr.V.D. Gathala, Addl.GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain portion of the land situated at village Bishangarh, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur is still lying vacant and the same can be allotted to the petitioner, and this fact has not been disputed by counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsels for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Bhanu [2026:RJ-JP:89] (2 of 2) [CW-22431/2017] Pratap Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4846/2010 on 07.12.2016. 3. Counsels for the parties submit that the instant writ petition be also disposed of in light of the similar directions issued in the case of Bhanu Pratap Singh (supra). 4. Considering the joint request made by counsels for the respective parties, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition in light of the similar directions issued in the case of Bhanu Pratap Singh (supra) and the respondents may consider the case of the petitioner for allotment of the land, if lying vacant at village Bishangarh, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /12