1 APHC010112822018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4931/2018 Between: 1. LANKA SRIKANTH, S/O L. SAMBHASIVA RAO. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE CULTIVATION. PRESENT ADDRESS VENKATAPALEM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. LANKA SAMBHASIVA RAO, S/O KOTESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, PRESENT ADDRESS VENKATAPALEM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. LANKA VENKATESWAR RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, PRESENT ADDRESS VENKATAPALEM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF CRDA, ANDHRA PRADESH AT VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DIRECTOR LANDS ANDHRA PRADESH CRDA, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR COMPETENT AUTHORITYFAC, LPS, UNIT NO.23 VENKATAPALEM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICERLA, (NH5) GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. S PRANATHI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: There is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 2. Since the learned Counsel representing the Writ Petitioners is no more, this Court had directed the Registry to issue fresh Notices to Writ Petitioner Nos.1 to 3. In compliance with this Order, Registry has issued Notices. Insofar as Petitioner No.1 is concerned, the Postal Endorsement would indicate that the Petitioner No.1 is living in abroad and therefore, service could not be effected. Insofar as the Writ Petitioner Nos.2 & 3 are concerned, the Office Report would indicate that they have been served on 01.12.2025. 3. Having taken note of the above facts, since the Petitioner Nos.2 & 3, who had already received Notices on 01.12.2025, have not evinced any interest in entering appearance either in-person or through a Counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss this matter for non-prosecution. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:05.01.2026 Vns