Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18336 (AP)

B CHANDRA OBUL REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6020/2026 · 2026-03-31

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010110852026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6020/2026 Between: 1. B CHANDRA OBUL REDDY, S/O. B. NADIPI GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF D.NO.77/161-2, SBI COLONY, RAVINDRA NAGAR POST, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 522237. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 522237. 3. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS.. COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT, 516002. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT, 516002. 5. THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, 516001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Shaik Sultan, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Papudippu Sashidar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning, Sri B. Ramesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kadapa Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kadapa Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Kadapa Municipal Corporation. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the amounts have been paid to the Writ Petitioner. Learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position that the amounts have been received and would submit that no further consideration is necessary. 4. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:01.04.2026 Vns