Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18333 (PNJ)

DEEPAK ALIAS KUKKU v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/11726/2026 · 2026-05-22

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-11726 IN THE H (137) DEEPAK ALIA STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. for t Ms. MANISHA BAT CRM-22638-202 Pray the case. Lear and has no object Acc case is allowed a this Court today i CRM-22639-202 Pray petition. 1726-2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CRM Dat ALIAS KUKKU Versus F HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Manvender Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana ****  BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2026 Prayer in this application is made fo Learned State counsel has advance objection if the application is allowed Accordingly the application for pre wed and the main petition is ordered t today itself. 2026 & CRM-M-11726-2026 Prayer in this application is made AB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-11726-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent MANISHA BATRA  vocate yana ade for preponing the hearing of dvance notice of the application lowed. preponing the hearing of the ered to be taken on the Board of made for withdrawing the main AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-11726 Lear and has no object The Sinc petition, the same  22.05.2026 Amit Sharma 1726-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned State counsel has advance objection if the application is allowed The application is allowed. Since the petitioner does not want t e same is dismissed as withdrawn. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye    dvance notice of the application lowed. want to proceed further with the (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.