23.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.47 ssi CRM (A) 453 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No.1504 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025 under Sections 109/126(2)/324(4)/351(3)/3(5) of the BNS 2023 read with Sections ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act. And In the matter of: Akramul Sk @ Ekramul Sk & others. …. Petitioners. Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen …for the petitioners Mr. Md. Anwar Hossain, Jr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Koustav Banerjee ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners are being falsely implicated in different cases over the self-same incident. Over the same incident of 11.11.2025 involving the same victims, the petitioners were made accused in the first FIR being Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1505 dated 11.11.2025. The petitioners surrendered before the learned jurisdictional Court and were granted bail in connection with the same case. Another allegation was made thereafter and an FIR was registered, being the present one, on the same day i.e., 11.11.2025 and involving the same set of victims with similar allegations. Only the time has been shown as 2 PM instead of at 12 o’ clock. Even if, the incidents are treated as different, the same would form part of the same transaction and therefore, part of the first case. 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that there was a case registered on the same day for assault on the same victim and the petitioners were granted bail therein upon surrender, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioners shall meet the I.O. twice a week till submission of report in final form. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)