Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:34862 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. :
954 of 2026 Decided on : 19.08.2026 Rajesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus R.D. Nazeem & Another …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate for respondent No.2. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Instructions dated 04.08.2026, have been placed on record by learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, which reveal that the judgment, in question, has been complied with. Hence, no further order is required to be passed, in this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2 2026:HHC:34862
2. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, if so advised.
( Virender Singh ) August 19, 2026( ps ) Judge