Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18329 (CHH)

SUKHMEN v. CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED,

REVP/64/2026 · 2026-03-22

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13590 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 64 of 2026 1 - Sukhmen W/o Late Sadhuram Gond Aged About 49 Years (At Present 56 Years), R/o Village- Mayhapur, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Surajpur C.G. 2 - Hridaylal S/o Late Sadhuram Gond Aged About 33 Years (At Present 40 Years), R/o Village- Mayhapur, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Surajpur C.G. 3 - Ramkeval S/o Late Sadhuram Gond Aged About 28 Years (At Present 35 Years), R/o Village- Mayhapur, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Surajpur C.G. 4 - Ramkumar S/o Late Sadhuram Gond Aged About 18 Years (At Present 25 Years), R/o Village- Mayhapur, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Surajpur C.G. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Danganiya, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Division Namnakala, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Ketka Road, Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Junior Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2026.03.23 17:01:01 +0530 2 23.03.2026 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition for reviewing the order dated 08.12.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 36 of 2018. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners had filed an application for withdrawal of petition bearing WP(C) No. 36 of 2018 granting liberty to avail the alternate remedy available to them under the law whereas in the impugned order dated 08.12.2025 it has been inadvertently observed that the petition has become infructuous. 3. Considering the application for withdrawal of WP(C) No. 36 of 2018 wherein the petitioners have prayed for withdrawal of writ petition on account of alternate remedy, the order dated 08.12.2025 is recalled and WP(C) No. 36 of 2018 is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy available to them under the law. 4. With this observation, the instant Review Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika