[2026:RJ-JP:88] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3153/2015 Mohd. Zia Ur Rahim M. Z Raheem Son Of Mohd. Abdurheem, By Caste- Musalman, 1617, Khajdoka Rasta, Indira Market, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Ltd Riico Through Its Managing Di, Udyog Bhawan, Jaipur. 2. The Sr. Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Ltd Rii, Jaipur Rural, 22 Godown Industrial Area, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ashish Sharma Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/01/2026 1. By passing the order dated 04.11.2011, the respondents have cancelled the allotment of plot bearing No.C-90 admeasuring 184.50 sq. meter situated at Kukas. 2. Counsel submits that a review petition was submitted against the aforesaid impugned order, however, the same was rejected vide impugned order dated 08.01.2015. 3. Counsel submits that aggrieved by both the aforesaid impugned orders, an appeal has been preferred by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority, i.e., Managing Director, RIICO on 03.02.2015. Counsel submits that as per the information received [2026:RJ-JP:88] (2 of 2) [CW-3153/2015] by the petitioner, the said appeal has been decided, but a copy of the order has not been supplied to the petitioner. 4. This Court finds no substance in such argument of the petitioner that the appeal of the petitioner has been decided and copy of the same has not been supplied to the petitioner. 5. It appears that the appeal submitted by the petitioner is still lying pending for adjudication on its merits and if it is pending before the Appellate Authority, it is expected from the Appellate Authority to make all possible endeavours to deciding the pending appeal (if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. In case, the appeal has already been decided by the Appellate Authority, then the respondents are directed to supply a copy of the impugned order to the petitioner and the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedies available to him as per law for the purpose of challenging the validity of the order, if any, passed against the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /3