( 2026:JHHC:19105 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2360 of 2026 ------ 1. Subodh Yadav @ Bachu Yadav, aged about 33 years, Son of Late Kailash Yadav 2. Sanjay Yadav @ Hola @ Bihari Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav, aged about 30 years, Son of Dawrika Bhokta @ Sukar Mahto Both are Resident of Village –Sihodih, P.O. –Sirsiya, P.S. – Giridih, District –Giridih, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha (2), Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.06 Dated- 30.06.2026 I.A. No.8366 of 2026 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to modify the order dated 11.06.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2360 of 2026 to the extent that name of Kailash Yadav may be substituted by the name of Late Bhagirath Yadav in para -2 of the order. It is next submitted that vide order dated 11.06.2026, it was directed that the petitioners will file a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the copy of the F.I.R. relating to the murder of Kailash Yadav in which the informant and his family members are accused persons. It is then submitted that the learned counsel inadvertently mentioned the name of Kailash Yadav but instead Late Bhagirath Yadav who was alleged to have been murdered by the informant of Sadar P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022 - namely Pritam Yadav. It is next submitted that Bhagirath Yadav was father of Sonu Yadav @ Sohan Yadav. Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer is allowed. The order dated 11.06.2026 is modified to the effect that the supplementary affidavit annexing the copy of the F.I.R. relating to the murder of Late Bhagirath Yadav in which the informant and his family members are accused be filed by the petitioners. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No. 2360 of 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 43 of 2026 arising out of Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.132 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 364 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were the members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant and his son and committed theft of Rs.25,000/- form the pocket of the informant after abducting him. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner drawing attention of this Court to the F.I.R. of Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 298 of 2020 that the informant of this case namely Pritam Yadav along with the co- accused persons of that case has committed murder of the father of the co-accused namely Sonu Kumar Yadav and drawing attention of this Court to the charge sheet of that case at page no.17, it is submitted that the petitioners are the witnesses of that case who have already been examined as P.W.4 and 5 and only because of that, this false case has been foisted. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 18.12.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih, in connection with S.T. No. 43 of 2026 arising out of Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.132 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30.06.2026 Sonu/