[2026:RJ-JP:1063] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15229/2016 Anirudh Jadawat Son Of Shri Mahipal Jadawat, House No. 7, Opposite Kaviraja Ki Haveli, Kotdi, Kota, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Municipal Administrative And Technical And Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection, G-3, Rajamahal Residency, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Dutt Sharma Dr. B.S. Nathawat and Ms. Samiksha Rawat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 12/01/2026 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “i) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the entire selection process made under advertisement (Ann.1) and accordingly the respondents may kindly be directed to conduct the fresh selection without applying the normalization process/ equi percentile equating pattern and the method of scaling. ii) In alternate Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to declare the original marks of every candidates pertains to each category and accordingly they may be directed to prepare the merit on the basis of such original actual marks without applying the method of equating system and accordingly after verification of documents, the appointment of petitioner and other candidates may kindly be made. [2026:RJ-JP:1063] (2 of 3) [CW-15229/2016] iii) Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider his original marks for selection upon the post of Executive Officer-IV, Revenue Officer-II, Revenue Inspector and Assistant Revenue Inspector by giving and the priority on above sequence accordingly he may be given appointment on any one post as per his merit with all consequential benefits. iv) Any other order or relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Considered application No.1/2024 for taking documents on record. 3. Having considered the material placed on record, the application No.1/2024 is allowed and the documents are taken on record. 4. CMS No.13536/2016 is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. During course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation and same is also pending before the respondents. He further submits that the respondents are under an obligation to consider the grievance raised by the petitioner but the respondents are not considering the grievance raised by the petitioner. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the respondents- Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, if any, after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2026:RJ-JP:1063] (3 of 3) [CW-15229/2016] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/13